Verkkowhen you are talking about an axiomatical immovable object and an axiomatical unstoppable force, you include two limit cases in the theory:

Verkkoif the force is unstoppable we must conclude that there is no possible way for it to change vectors or speed, and therefore a transferrance of energy is impossible and.

Verkkothe only reasonable answer is, 'the unstoppable force stops, the immovable object moves', invalidating the categories, but making a nice symmetry.

Recommended for you

The paradox assumes a static universe where an unstoppable force encounters an immovable object.

Verkkoexplore the nature of change:

Verkkothe paradox of the unstoppable force vs the immovable object has intrigued philosophers and thinkers for centuries.

It challenges the very laws of.

Well, letโ€™s suppose that we define an โ€œunstoppableโ€ force to be.

Verkkocomes from the irresistible force paradox, which says that if there exists an irresistible force, it follows logically that there cannot be any such thing as an immovable object.

Verkkowhat would happen if an unstoppable force met with an unmovable, impenetrable object?

You may also like